According to supporters of the Milwaukee streetcar system (scroll to the bottom for the updates to the story), this will be a “magnet for young people” and tourists alike.
Although the Mayor’s chief of staff, Patrick Curley, admits that:
Local funding may be necessary for the streetcar system, which could come from a variety of sources including tax incremental financing (TIF) or parking surcharges
Frankly, that’s the last thing we should be concerned about. Of course, we’ll find a way to pay for a vital piece of infrastructure if it means ushering our city into the 21st century as Alderman Robert Bauman suggests. Ald. Bauman goes on to contend that:
There are dozens and dozens of cities, many of which are smaller and with less population density than Milwaukee, which have experienced great success in terms of ridership and public acceptance (with rail systems). Right now we are behind the curve.
In Mayor Barrett’s Comprehensive Transit Strategy for Milwaukee, Seattle and Cincinnati are ahead of Bauman’s curve, while Toledo and Omaha are behind it.
This reminds me of the old adage about whether it is wise to jump off a bridge if everyone else does the same. Randel O’Toole, a Cato senior fellow, warns cities about the danger of jumping off that bridge.
Will the streetcar be successful? Will a KRM, heavy-rail linking Chicago-Milwaukee-Madison, and perhaps light-rail transform our regional economy and quality of life? Possibly.
But that’s not the right nor only question to ask. How should we pay for these “improvements” or any improvement to our public transportation infrastructure (yep, that includes roads and highways)? What, if anything, should we subsidize? Should we subsidize location decisions or should central planners decide where it is best for us to live and work? And why are private transportation solutions not part of the discussion?
Dr. Michael Munger, chair of the Political Science department at Duke University and former North Carolina gubernatorial candidate, documents how a private transportation system flourished in Chile before it was “transformed” into a better system for all Chileans.
Hopefully, we do learn by the examples of other cities both in the U.S. and around the world, and proceed cautiously where taxpayer funds and trasnportation options are concerned. Unfortunately, the last few months leave me less optimistic on that front.
Perhaps my pessimism will be drown out by the rush of stampeding tourists and young folks flocking to the region. We shall see.